ankara escort ankara escort çankaya escort çankaya escort escort bayan çankaya istanbul rus escort eryaman escort ankara escort kızılay escort istanbul escort ankara escort ankara escort escort ankara istanbul rus Escort atasehir Escort beylikduzu Escort Ankara Escort malatya Escort kuşadası Escort gaziantep Escort izmir Escort

Kintu (supra)in which Bbosa J noticed you to definitely;

If the activities has actually matrimonial property and when sure, perhaps the petitioner is permitted a portion on the matrimonial possessions?

A-try is made so you can identify the definition of ‘matrimonial property’ by Women Justice Esther Kisakye in the example of Rwabinumi Against. Bahimbisomwe Municipal Focus Zero. ten from 2009 in which she cited with approval happening away from Muwanga Against.

She adduced proof photos exhibiting the fresh entrances of your own store this new Fuso vehicle where items was packed with particular of the natives enjoying the fresh new do so just like the EXHP 16 (a), (b) and you will (c)

“matrimonial house is realized in different ways by differing people. There is always property which the couples decided to name domestic. There is certainly possessions that can be obtained separately because of the for every spouse prior to otherwise shortly after relationship. Then there is possessions which a husband may control trust towards clan. All these would be to in my opinion meet the requirements in another way. The home to which for each spouse can be named would be the fact possessions and this people chose to name house and that they together subscribe”.

With respect to the evidence toward record, the latest petitioner testified one up on their ire Trading Hub collaborating since a family group running an entire business retail store and later jointly purchased residential property regarding a-one Hajji Badru Sande which in fact had a property involved. This new agreement from revenue was adduced inside the research just like the EXHP1. She after that stated that when they relocated to Rukungiri, it ordered a lot more pieces of residential property which include, residential property off a-one John Kabareebe, (Showcase P2), another purchased from the respondent off John Kabareebe, (Showcase P3) however another jointly ordered regarding F. Mugondo in which it depending the brand new matrimonial domestic(see Showcase P4). She along with presented photo of the property since EXHP20 and you will receipts of some of the items she sold in the house once the EXHP21 (a), (b) and you can (c). She additionally adduced EXHP5 just like the a binding agreement to own residential property purchased by the respondent from Mugume Polly about what he has good banana plantation, EXHP6 as land ordered jointly from W. Rushakama that can provides a great banana plantation and you will EXHP7 due to the fact homes bought of the respondent from Nshijja .Grams where it cultivated sweet carrots.

The original lot (EXHP8) which is found at Nyakihanga is ordered of the petitioner from a one Bataringaya, EXHP9 ‘s the agreement to your other piece of land which are a present in one Bakasharebwa and you may Kirabo into the respondent and you can currently enjoys a banana plantation

The brand new petitioner also testified the pair afterwards transferred to Kampala and you can throughout their stay together with her started dealing in the attempting to sell trucks off whoever proceeds it purchased a cab which they together with ended up selling out-of and soon after been powering a store. Then they purchased 6 bits of married secrets-datingwebsite land two of that have house together with people ranches. That EXHP10 are a contract getting house bought because of the petitioner away from a single Byangwanye Obed, yet , EXHP11 is for land purchased as one throughout the people of the fresh late Levi Butumanya, EXHP12 once the house bought together regarding Kalumba Faisal which includes domestic site in the Nateete and EXHP13 as proof of property during the Kiwatule as you bought regarding Kalyegira Adone and you can with house and properties.

The petitioner after that adduced proof of an agreement (EXHP14) for which the new respondent handed over the store for the Ntinda in order to their and have now adduced evidence of receipts to the book she taken care of the store while the EXHP15 (a) and you may (b). She testified that after brand new respondent premiered out of jail, he bankrupt the store, piled much of merchandize on it on to a truck and you may grabbed these to Rwashamire where the guy install some other store, however, later gone the goods so you’re able to Rukungiri. She reported that event given that thieves from the Kiira road Cops channel vide SD Ref./2010.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *